Master prompt
Smart Mode — Canada refusal recovery (reapply vs reconsideration vs JR)
Adaptive intake. The AI branches on refusal date, refusal grounds, judicial-review window, documentary gap vs interpretation, and prior history — to route the applicant to reapplication, reconsideration request, or Federal Court judicial review.
CanadaRefusalReapplyReconsiderationJudicial ReviewGCMS NotesFederal CourtSmart ModeAdaptive
Build a Canada refusal-recovery strategy for the applicant based on the answers I gave you. §1 — REFUSAL DECONSTRUCTION Set out: (a) Refused stream (study R216 / work R200 / visitor R179 / PR / sponsorship / citizenship / restoration) (b) Refusal date + date received + remaining JR window (15-day inland under FC Rules / 60-day overseas under s. 72(2)(b) IRPA) (c) GCMS notes status — obtained / ordered / not obtained (d) Officer-recorded grounds, parsed line by line For EACH ground, classify as: (i) Documentary gap — curable by re-application with stronger evidence (ii) Interpretation / procedural fairness — better candidate for reconsideration or JR (iii) Credibility finding — hardest to recover from (iv) Statutory ineligibility (e.g. s. 40 misrepresentation, s. 36 criminality, s. 34 security) §2 — ROUTE RECOMMENDATION (60-80 words) Pick ONE primary route (reapplication / reconsideration / leave-and-JR) and one secondary route (parallel track if applicable). Justify based on grounds + window + applicant urgency. §3 — IF REAPPLICATION (a) New cover letter framing — what changed, what is now stronger (b) Addressing-the-prior-refusal SOP paragraph (80-120 words) — name the officer concern, name the new evidence (c) Fresh-evidence checklist — every document that is materially different from the prior file (d) Disclosure under R10(1) — every prior refusal in every country (e) Choice of IRCC form (IMM 1294 study / IMM 1295 work / IMM 5257 visitor / IMM 0008 PR / IMM 5710 in-Canada) §4 — IF RECONSIDERATION (a) Letter to the deciding officer / visa office (not the IRCC general line) (b) Specific procedural-fairness or evident-error argument (c) Attached new evidence (if any) that the officer did not see (d) Express request for re-opening + re-determination (e) Disclaimer: reconsideration is discretionary and non-statutory; preserve the JR window in parallel §5 — IF LEAVE AND JUDICIAL REVIEW (a) Form IR-1 Notice of Application for Leave and Judicial Review (b) Statement of grounds under s. 72(1) IRPA + s. 18.1(4) Federal Courts Act (c) Affidavit + Certified Tribunal Record request (d) Memorandum of Argument addressing reasonableness (Vavilov framework, Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65) or procedural fairness (Baker v Canada, [1999] 2 SCR 817) (e) Federal Court filing fee + counsel-time budget (f) Realistic outcomes — leave granted/denied; if leave granted, re-determination with or without directions §6 — PARALLEL TRACKS (where applicable) (a) R182 restoration if onshore and within 90 days of status loss (b) Spousal open work permit application if spouse has eligible status (c) Visitor record + bridge while reapplication is pending (d) Different visa stream entirely (study permit + PGWP-to-PR if the refused stream was direct PR) §7 — THE 3 HIGHEST-ROI LEVERS BEFORE NEXT SUBMISSION Rank what would move outcomes most for THIS applicant. Examples: obtain GCMS notes urgently; secure new evidence on the specific officer concern; pivot to a different visa stream; preserve JR window while reapplication is in flight; engage Federal-Court-experienced counsel for a procedural-fairness argument. §8 — CITATIONS Anchor each recommendation to: (a) IRPA section (s. 11 visa requirements, s. 40 misrepresentation, s. 72 judicial review) (b) IRPR section (R10(1) disclosure, R182 restoration, R216 / R200 / R179 substantive tests) (c) Federal Courts Act s. 18.1 (d) Federal Court Citizenship, Immigration and Refugee Protection Rules (e) Leading cases — Vavilov 2019 SCC 65, Baker [1999] 2 SCR 817, Hassani v. MCI 2006 FC 1283 (officer duty to put concerns), Khan v. MCI 2001 FCA 345 (f) IRCC Operational Manual (OP / IP / ENF) — DRAFT only. For RCIC and / or Federal-Court-experienced immigration counsel review. Time-sensitive — the judicial-review window does NOT pause for reconsideration or reapplication, so JR preservation may be the priority even when reapplication is the primary route. Verify all dates, deadlines, and current IRCC / Federal Court procedural requirements before relying on this draft.
Unlock the vault to see the full prompt