Master prompt
General refusal letter analyzer (any visa type)
Decodes IRCC checkbox refusal letter shorthand into specific R-numbers, GCMS-note inferences, and 4-track strategy options.
CanadaRefusalAnalyzerGCMSATIPCross-service
Analyse the refusal letter for [CLIENT_NAME] ([VISA_TYPE]). IRCC uses templated checkbox letters that hide the actual officer reasoning. Your task is to decode the boxes, infer the GCMS notes, and recommend a 4-track strategy. REFUSAL LETTER: """ [REFUSAL_LETTER] """ APPLICANT PROFILE: [APPLICATION_PROFILE] §1 — BOX-CHECKED GROUNDS DECODED (150-200 words) For each checkbox in the refusal letter, identify: (a) The exact box text (quote verbatim) (b) The IRPA / IRPR section it corresponds to (c) The implicit officer suspicion Common refusal checkboxes + decoding: ▪ "I am not satisfied that you will leave Canada at the end of your authorised stay" → R216(1)(b) (TR) / R200(1)(b) (WP) — ties / purpose / intent ▪ "Your purpose of visit" → R216(1)(b) — purpose-of-stay ▪ "Your family ties in Canada and your country of residence" → R216(1)(b) — ties imbalance ▪ "Your travel history" → R216(1)(b) — limited history reads as risk ▪ "Your personal assets and financial status" → R220 (TR) / sufficient funds — financial sufficiency ▪ "Your current employment situation" → R216(1)(b) ties — weak home-country tether ▪ "Your purpose for visiting Canada is not consistent with a temporary stay" → R216 — overstated stay length / unclear purpose ▪ "The documentation you provided is not sufficient" → R200(1)(b) / R216(1) — evidentiary gap ▪ For WP: "I am not satisfied that you can adequately perform the work sought" → R200(3)(a) — qualifications doubt ▪ For WP: "I am not satisfied that the job offer is genuine" → R200(1)(c)(ii.1) / R203 — employer-side doubt ▪ For PR-EE: misrepresentation grounds → IRPA s.40 — 5-year ban ▪ For PR-Medical: s.38 — medical inadmissibility (cost or risk to public health) ▪ For PR-Criminal: s.36 — criminal inadmissibility §2 — LIKELY GCMS NOTE CONTENT (200-250 words) GCMS (Global Case Management System) holds the officer's internal notes — the actual reasoning. The refusal letter is a sanitised summary. For each refusal ground identified, infer the likely GCMS note content based on [APPLICATION_PROFILE]: Format: "GCMS likely says (inference): 'I find that the applicant has weak ties to home country based on [...]. The applicant's [...]. Therefore I am not satisfied [...].'" Common GCMS patterns: • Identifies one specific weak element (gap year, low funds, prior refusal, etc.) • States the officer's reasoning chain • Concludes with the operative finding §3 — IMMEDIATE ATIP RECOMMENDATION (80-100 words) File an ATIP request for GCMS notes WITHIN 7 DAYS: • Online: atip-aiprp.apps.gc.ca/atip/welcome.do • Free under Privacy Act + Access to Information Act • Standard service: 30 calendar days • Provide: UCI, application number, request "all notes relating to my [VISA_TYPE] application refused on [DATE]" GCMS notes reveal: • Which specific element officer fixated on • Whether evidence was ignored or misinterpreted • Patterns that recur in same visa office • Whether new evidence would actually move the needle DO NOT skip ATIP — it's free, fast, and informs every other track. §4 — FOUR-TRACK STRATEGY OPTIONS (300-350 words) Track A — RECONSIDERATION REQUEST (informal, fast): • Timeline: 0-8 weeks from filing • Cost: free (no fee) • Success: ~10-20% • When useful: officer obviously erred OR new evidence existed at time of decision but was not properly weighed • Filing: IRCC web form, addressed to same visa office • Risk: low; doesn't preclude other tracks Track B — REAPPLICATION (cleanest if material change): • Timeline: depends on visa type (4-12 weeks for TR; 6-12 months for PR-EE) • Cost: standard application fee (CAD 100-1,500 depending on visa) • Success: depends on what changed • When useful: refusal grounds are addressable with new evidence (improved test scores, new job offer, new bank statements, completed studies) • Filing: standard application channel • R40 DISCLOSURE: prior refusal MUST be disclosed; failure = misrepresentation • Risk: premature reapplication = same officer + same decision; worse paper trail Track C — FEDERAL COURT JUDICIAL REVIEW (formal, costly, slow): • Timeline: 15 days to file leave application (60 days if outside Canada); 6-12 months for full hearing • Cost: CAD 50 filing fee + CAD 1,500-5,000 legal fees (Canadian counsel required for procedural representation) • Success: ~25-30% leave grant rate; settlements before hearing common • When useful: officer made clear legal/procedural error (Vavilov unreasonableness, Baker procedural unfairness, applied wrong section) • Filing: must engage Canadian counsel + Federal Court Registry • Standard: reasonableness (Vavilov) or correctness (procedural) • Risk: time-locked window; loss = no further appeal short of reconsideration Track D — DIFFERENT PATHWAY (sometimes the cleanest reset): • Apply for different visa type (study → work; work → spousal sponsorship; etc.) • Apply to different country (Australia / UK / New Zealand if Canada refusals stack) • Apply through different stream (FSW → SINP; CEC → PNP-Ontario) • When useful: multiple refusals + structural issue (e.g. weak ties no matter what) §5 — RECOMMENDED PRIMARY + PARALLEL TRACK (80-100 words) Based on the refusal grounds + [APPLICATION_PROFILE]: Primary recommendation: [Track A / B / C / D] Justification: [why this track has highest probability given facts] Parallel track: [usually ATIP + one other track] Avoid: • Pursuing all 4 tracks simultaneously (cost + confusion + R40 disclosure mess) • Filing JR without GCMS notes (you're litigating blind) • Reapplying within 30 days of refusal with same evidence (worse outcome) §6 — 7-DAY ACTION CHECKLIST (60-80 words) □ File ATIP today (free, no risk) □ Calendar the JR 15-day deadline (HARD) □ Begin collecting new evidence per refusal grounds □ Engage Canadian counsel quote for JR if grounds suggest legal error □ Inform applicant of timeline + costs □ Do NOT premature-reapply End with: "DRAFT REFUSAL ANALYSIS — for RCIC review. ATIP must be filed within 7 days; JR 15-day window is non-extendable. If criminal / medical / misrep grounds, engage immigration counsel — not just RCIC — before deciding strategy."
Unlock the vault to see the full prompt