Master prompt
Refusal recovery — PGWP refusal outreach (Indian-student stream)
250-340 word outreach email targeting Indian students who received a PGWP refusal after PPP / private-college program issues.
EmailCARefusalPGWPMarketing
Write a PGWP-refusal outreach email (250-340 words) to [RECIPIENT_NAME] whose PGWP was refused following a [PROGRAM_TYPE] situation. PGWP refusals connected to PPP / private-college partnerships are time-sensitive because the JR window is 15 days from notification. Source: - Prospect: [RECIPIENT_NAME] - Program: [PROGRAM_TYPE] - Refusal ground hint: [REFUSAL_GROUND_HINT] - JR deadline (days remaining): [JR_DEADLINE_DAYS] - Firm: [FIRM_NAME] · RCIC [RCIC_NUMBER] · [FOUNDER_FIRST_NAME] - JR partner firm: [JR_PARTNER_FIRM] - Consult URL: [CONSULT_URL] - Address: [FIRM_POSTAL_ADDRESS] Structure (with labels): SUBJECT LINE (max 55 chars): NOT alarmist but time-aware. Examples: - "On your PGWP refusal - the 15-day window" - "PGWP refusal + [PROGRAM_TYPE]: reading carefully" PREHEADER (max 90 chars): "JR or reconsideration - depends entirely on the GCMS notes." GREETING: "Hi [RECIPIENT_NAME]," PARA 1 (50-70 words) - TIME-AWARE OPEN: State that PGWP refusals tied to [PROGRAM_TYPE] have a 15-day Federal Court JR window from notification. If [JR_DEADLINE_DAYS] is non-empty, restate it factually: "Based on what you shared, you have approximately [JR_DEADLINE_DAYS] days remaining." Do NOT manufacture urgency. PARA 2 (60-90 words) - WHAT MAY HAVE HAPPENED: Walk through the most common PGWP refusal grounds for [PROGRAM_TYPE]: (a) program not on the eligible list as of study start date, (b) PPP / public-private partnership status, (c) study-permit gap or part-time study. State that the actual ground is in the GCMS notes and the next step depends on what the notes say. PARA 3 (70-100 words) - THE TWO PATHS: Honest framing. Path A: Reconsideration request to IRCC (faster, lower cost, lower legal force). Path B: Federal Court judicial review (binding, higher cost, requires counsel - [FIRM_NAME] refers to [JR_PARTNER_FIRM] for the JR side). State that not every refusal is JR-worthy and the GCMS notes determine which path is honest. PARA 4 (40-60 words) - THE OFFER: Refusal-review consult at [CONSULT_URL]. State the fee as one specific number. Outline what is included in 2-3 bullets. State that the consult itself produces a written read of the notes, NOT a guarantee of either path. PARA 5 (15-25 words) - CLOSE: "If you have already engaged a lawyer or consultant on this matter, just delete this email - I will not follow up." SIGNATURE: [FOUNDER_FIRST_NAME] RCIC [RCIC_NUMBER] - [FIRM_NAME] FOOTER (CASL + DPDP): "[FIRM_NAME] - [FIRM_POSTAL_ADDRESS]. You are receiving this because you submitted a refusal-review inquiry. To unsubscribe (one-click) - [unsubscribe-link]." CICC compliance - PGWP refusals are highest-risk: - NEVER promise reconsideration approval or JR success. - NEVER cite a "we win X percent of JRs" statistic. - The JR-partner referral to [JR_PARTNER_FIRM] is mandatory if [FIRM_NAME] does not hold a law license. - The "if you have already engaged" deflection is mandatory under CICC §32. - Do not use urgency-manufacturing language (no "URGENT", "ACT NOW", "TIME RUNNING OUT") even when [JR_DEADLINE_DAYS] is genuinely small. Voice: - Lawyerly, calm, no exclamation marks. - First-person singular. - Banned: "guaranteed", "we will win", "fight for your future", "embark". End with: "- DRAFT - for RCIC review. Confirm the JR-partner referral language, confirm [JR_DEADLINE_DAYS] was actually shared by the prospect (not assumed), and confirm one-click unsubscribe before sending."
Unlock the vault to see the full prompt