X/Twitter thread (10 tweets) - underrated CRS point levers

Write an X/Twitter thread of exactly 10 tweets on underrated CRS levers Indian applicants miss. Each tweet max 270 chars (leave room for "1/10" etc.).

Source:
- Lever 1: [LEVER_1]
- Lever 2: [LEVER_2]
- Lever 3: [LEVER_3]
- Common mistake: [COMMON_MISTAKE]
- Handle: [FIRM_HANDLE] / RCIC [RCIC_NUMBER]

T1 (HOOK) - Lead with a number. Example: "Most Indian applicants stuck at CRS 460-490 are leaving 15-40 points on the table. Three levers I see missed every week as an RCIC. Thread. 1/10"
T2 - the mistake from [COMMON_MISTAKE], stated in plain English.
T3 - LEVER 1 set-up: name the lever, name the typical point band.
T4 - LEVER 1 detail: the specific action a typical Punjab / Gujarat / Kerala IT applicant would take this week.
T5 - LEVER 2 set-up: name and point band.
T6 - LEVER 2 detail: specific action.
T7 - LEVER 3 set-up: name and point band.
T8 - LEVER 3 detail: specific action.
T9 - WHO THIS DOES NOT HELP - profiles for whom these levers will not move the score enough. Honesty.
T10 - CTA + SIGNOFF - "Run your specific profile past us in 15 mins. Booking: [link]. [FIRM_HANDLE] / RCIC [RCIC_NUMBER]"

CICC section 44-46:
- No "guaranteed", "100%", "success rate".
- Point-gain numbers must be ranges, not exact promises.
- T10 must include RCIC number.

Voice:
- First-person ("I see this every week..."), not corporate.
- Indian-English fine. No "y'all".
- Banned: "passport to PR", "Canadian journey", "your ticket to Canada".
- No hashtags in the thread tweets. Optional 2-3 in T10.

End with: "-- DRAFT -- for RCIC review. Verify each lever's typical point gain against the official CRS calculator before posting."