Master prompt
AIPV acceptable investment categories + portfolio strategy (NZ)
Detailed breakdown of acceptable investment categories under Active Investor Plus — direct equity, managed funds, listed equities/bonds, philanthropy, residential development — with portfolio strategy for capital efficiency.
NZInvestor visaAIPVDirect equityManaged fundsNZXPhilanthropy
Design an Active Investor Plus Visa (AIPV) compliant investment portfolio for [CLIENT_NAME] under Immigration Instructions BJ. CLIENT PROFILE - Total available (NZD): [TOTAL_NZD_AVAILABLE] - Risk appetite: [RISK_APPETITE] - Investment knowledge: [INVESTMENT_KNOWLEDGE] - Primary goals: [PRIMARY_GOALS] - Sector preferences: Open REGULATORY FRAME — ACCEPTABLE INVESTMENT CATEGORIES UNDER AIPV (BJ instructions; // 2026-05 — verify against current INZ Operational Manual) §1 — CATEGORY A: DIRECT EQUITY IN NZ PRIVATE BUSINESSES (weighting 3x) What qualifies: - Ordinary share equity (not convertible debt) in NZ-incorporated private companies - Companies must be operating businesses (not holding companies / passive shells) - Excluded: residential real estate buy-to-rent companies, finance-only entities, businesses primarily passive - Minimum investment per business varies; pooling permitted across multiple direct holdings Typical instruments: - Direct seed / Series A investment into NZ tech start-ups - Late-stage minority stakes in established NZ private companies - Co-investment alongside professional NZ angels / VC funds (Icehouse Ventures, Pacific Channel, GD1, Movac, etc.) - Acquisition of an existing NZ business as principal owner — requires careful structuring to avoid being classed as an Entrepreneur category instead Pros: - Best capital efficiency (3x) — NZ$1M raw = NZ$3M weighted - Aligns with NZ's strategic intent: capital into growth businesses - Potential for capital appreciation + dividend income - Path to operational involvement if desired Cons: - Highest risk — illiquid, possible loss of capital - Due-diligence overhead - 4-year hold; selling before triggers compliance issues - Foreign-investor disclosure obligations under NZ Companies Act 1993 For [CLIENT_NAME] with [RISK_APPETITE]: state suitability and indicative allocation. §2 — CATEGORY B: MANAGED FUNDS WITH NZ PRIVATE-BUSINESS EXPOSURE (weighting 2x) What qualifies: - NZ-licensed managed investment schemes investing in NZ private businesses - Examples (verify current list): Movac Fund 5, Pacific Channel, Icehouse Ventures, Pencarrow, Direct Capital - Fund must demonstrate substantial NZ private-business exposure; passively managed listed funds typically don't qualify here Pros: - Professional management — outsourced DD + monitoring - Diversification across portfolio companies - 2x weighting — still capital-efficient vs 1x listed - Suitable for clients with no direct NZ network Cons: - Management fees (1.5-2.5% pa + carry) - Limited liquidity — typically 5-10y fund life with extensions - Vintage risk — fund performance varies by entry year - Capital calls / commitment periods can lag visa application timing For [CLIENT_NAME] with [INVESTMENT_KNOWLEDGE]: this is often the default backbone for first-time NZ investors. §3 — CATEGORY C: NZX-LISTED EQUITIES + BONDS (weighting 1x) What qualifies: - Equities listed on NZX Main Board (e.g. Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Auckland International Airport, Fonterra Shareholders Fund, Spark, Mainfreight, a2 Milk, Mercury, Contact Energy) - NZX-listed corporate bonds, government bonds (NZ Government Bonds via NZX), bonds issued by NZ registered banks - Includes NZX-listed managed funds (e.g. SmartShares ETFs) Pros: - Most liquid — easy to enter / exit - Transparent pricing - Low minimum investment - Suitable for parking funds while deploying to higher-multiplier categories - Suitable for clients with [RISK_APPETITE] = Conservative Cons: - Worst capital efficiency under AIPV (1x) - Limited universe — NZX market cap small vs ASX / NYSE - INR/NZD currency exposure (need to consider hedging) For [CLIENT_NAME]: state recommended NZX allocation as % of total. §4 — CATEGORY D: PHILANTHROPIC DONATIONS (weighting 4x — HIGHEST) What qualifies: - Donations to INZ-approved philanthropic recipients (verify current INZ-published list) - Typically: NZ-registered charities with broad public benefit (universities, research institutes, conservation trusts, Māori development trusts) - Capital is gifted — NOT recoverable Pros: - Highest multiplier — NZ$1M raw = NZ$4M weighted - Tax-deductible up to 33.33% of donor's taxable NZ income in year of gift (if donor is a NZ tax resident — usually not applicable in Year 1, becomes useful after relocation) - Strong social-licence signal - Used strategically to close threshold gap cheaply (e.g. NZ$250K philanthropy = NZ$1M weighted) Cons: - Capital lost permanently - Approved-recipient list is constrained — must verify recipient is on INZ approved list - Some clients culturally / financially uncomfortable with non-recoverable component For [CLIENT_NAME]: discuss whether philanthropy makes sense as marginal threshold-closer. Typically suitable when raw capital is mid-range (NZ$4.5M-5M) and weighting needs lift. §5 — CATEGORY E: RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT (weighting 2x — NARROW) What qualifies (// 2026-05 — verify; this category has been periodically restricted): - Investment in new-build residential development that adds to NZ housing stock - Generally NOT acceptable: buy-to-rent existing housing, residential property for personal use - Must be at scale + demonstrably adding supply - Subject to Overseas Investment Office (OIO) consent rules for residential land Pros: - 2x weighting - Aligns with NZ housing-supply policy - Tangible asset Cons: - Narrow definition — easily disqualified - OIO consent process can be slow - Construction / market risk - Residential land foreign ownership rules (Overseas Investment Amendment Act 2018) restrictive For most Indian-origin clients without NZ property-development experience, this category is typically NOT recommended unless they have a specific partner. §6 — RECOMMENDED PORTFOLIO ALLOCATIONS BY PROFILE Based on [RISK_APPETITE] and [INVESTMENT_KNOWLEDGE]: CONSERVATIVE (capital preservation, hands-off): - Managed funds NZ private business (2x): 30-40% raw capital - NZX-listed equities + bonds (1x): 50-60% raw capital - Philanthropy (4x) — marginal threshold closer: 5-10% - Direct equity (3x): 0-5% Indicative raw NZ$5.5M-6.5M to clear NZ$5M weighted comfortably. BALANCED (moderate growth, diversification): - Direct equity in 2-4 NZ private companies (3x): 25-35% - Managed funds (2x): 30-40% - NZX-listed (1x): 20-25% - Philanthropy (4x): 5-10% Indicative raw NZ$4.5M-5.5M to clear NZ$5M weighted. GROWTH / ACTIVE OPERATOR (private equity tolerance, NZ operational role): - Direct equity / acquisition of operating NZ business (3x): 50-70% - Managed funds — VC vintage (2x): 15-25% - NZX-listed (1x): 5-15% - Philanthropy (4x): 0-10% Indicative raw NZ$3.5M-4.5M to clear NZ$5M weighted (capital-efficient). Cross-reference [PRIMARY_GOALS] + Open for sector tilt within direct-equity portion. §7 — IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP Phase 1 — Pre-EOI (Month 0-2): (a) Engage NZ-licensed financial adviser (FAP — Financial Advice Provider) (b) Shortlist managed fund managers; request information memoranda (c) Identify 2-3 candidate direct-equity opportunities (Icehouse Ventures, Angel Association, etc.) (d) Identify philanthropic recipient(s) from INZ-approved list (e) Open in-principle NZ bank account (most accept HNW non-resident applications) Phase 2 — Post-EOI / Pre-ITA (Month 2-4): (f) Letters of intent / soft commitments from managers / direct investees (g) Source-of-funds dossier complete (see slot 4) (h) FEMA / LRS planning with Indian banker + CA Phase 3 — Post-ITA, Pre-Grant (Month 4-10): (i) Full application lodged within 4-month ITA window (j) INZ processing — typically 6-12 months (k) Approved-in-principle: 6 months to transfer + deploy Phase 4 — Post-Grant (Month 10-16): (l) Funds transferred via FEMA-compliant route (LRS + ODI as applicable) (m) Funds deployed into committed instruments (n) Annual investor declaration commences Phase 5 — Years 2-4: (o) Maintain investments (selling triggers compliance review) (p) Reweighting between categories permitted with documentation (q) 117-day presence tracked (r) Year-end annual declarations §8 — TAX & STRUCTURING NOTES (a) NZ tax residency — if applicant becomes NZ tax resident, worldwide income taxable (with credits via India-NZ DTAA) (b) Transitional Resident exemption — NZ offers a 4-year exemption from tax on most foreign-sourced income for new migrants (potentially valuable; engage NZ tax adviser) (c) Holding investments via NZ-incorporated company vs personal name — discuss with tax adviser (d) Indian-side: residency under Income Tax Act 1961 s.6 — RNOR status useful for the first 2-3 years post-migration (e) FEMA: investments are made post-remittance under LRS / ODI — must be in personal name (or per ODI scheme rules if corporate) §9 — RED FLAGS / DEAL-BREAKERS - "Guaranteed return" pitches from unregulated NZ promoters — refuse, report - Promises of "AIPV-compliant" product that doesn't appear on INZ acceptable list - Pressure to invest before EOI approved (capital should not leave India until ITA + visa approval) - Sectors with OIO consent overlay (sensitive land, fishing quota, certain critical infrastructure) — extra approval layer - Investment that requires further capital calls beyond initial — confirm 4-year maintenance obligation can be met without triggering further LRS / ODI End with: "DRAFT investment strategy — for IAA-licensed adviser and NZ-licensed FAP review. Does NOT constitute financial advice. Confirm current AIPV category weightings, INZ-approved philanthropic recipients list, and any 2025-2026 settings reform before client commits capital. NZ Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 applies to all investment activity in NZ — only deal with FMA-licensed product providers and FAPs."
Unlock the vault to see the full prompt