Master prompt
O-1A extraordinary ability — researcher / founder / senior tech
O-1A petition strategy for Indian researchers, founders, senior engineers. Three-criteria minimum out of eight under 8 CFR 214.2(o)(3)(iii).
USAO-1AExtraordinary abilityResearcherFounderI-129
Build an O-1A extraordinary ability petition strategy for [BENEFICIARY_NAME] in [FIELD], filed by [PETITIONER] at USD [SALARY_USD]/yr.
§1 — STATUTORY FRAMEWORK (90-120 words)
INA §101(a)(15)(O)(i); 8 CFR §214.2(o)(3). O-1A covers sciences, education, business, athletics. Standard:
• "Sustained national or international acclaim"
• Recognition at top of field "demonstrated by sustained national or international acclaim"
• Coming to US to continue work in the area
Two evidence paths:
(a) One-time achievement of major international acclaim (Nobel, Pulitzer, Olympic medal — narrow)
(b) At least 3 of 8 evidentiary criteria under 8 CFR §214.2(o)(3)(iii)
Adjudicator applies two-step Kazarian (Kazarian v. USCIS, 596 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir. 2010)):
Step 1: count criteria satisfied
Step 2: final merits — assess whether totality establishes extraordinary ability
§2 — THE 8 CRITERIA — MAP [KEY_ACHIEVEMENTS] (180-220 words)
(1) NATIONALLY/INTERNATIONALLY RECOGNIZED PRIZES — major awards in [FIELD]
(2) MEMBERSHIP — associations requiring outstanding achievement (judged by recognized experts); e.g. IEEE Fellow, ACM Fellow, NAE
(3) PUBLISHED MATERIAL ABOUT BENEFICIARY — articles in major media or professional publications about beneficiary's work; press coverage in TechCrunch, Forbes, Wired, top journals
(4) JUDGING THE WORK OF OTHERS — peer review for top journals/conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, top tier in [FIELD]); grant review panels
(5) ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS OF MAJOR SIGNIFICANCE — patents in widespread commercial use, founding-engineer status at notable company, papers with citations + influence
(6) AUTHORSHIP OF SCHOLARLY ARTICLES — peer-reviewed publications; for industry, white papers + technical blog posts at high-engagement
(7) HIGH SALARY OR REMUNERATION — top decile compensation for [FIELD]; OEWS or industry survey comparison
(8) LEADING/CRITICAL ROLE — for distinguished organizations; founder-CTO, principal engineer at FAANG, lab director
USCIS 2022 Policy Manual update (Vol 2, Part M) explicitly recognized:
• Entrepreneurship + founder roles for criterion (5)
• Letters of recommendation explaining significance for criterion (5) — even without citation counts
• Modern "celebrity" indicators in tech (LinkedIn, podcasts) supplementing traditional media for criterion (3)
§3 — ADVISORY OPINION (50-70 words)
8 CFR §214.2(o)(5) requires written advisory opinion from peer group / labor organization / management organization with expertise in [FIELD]. For tech founders — peer-group letter from VC partners, technical fellows. For researchers — academic society. Letter is consultative; USCIS not bound, but absence is grounds for RFE.
§4 — RECOMMENDATION LETTERS (130-170 words)
6-10 letters from independent recognized experts in [FIELD]:
• Half from "independent" experts (not co-authors, not co-workers)
• Each letter must:
- Explain writer's standing in field
- Detail SPECIFIC contributions of [BENEFICIARY_NAME]
- Tie to one or more 8-criteria prongs
- Address "major significance" qualitatively, not generic praise
Top mistakes:
• Boilerplate letters with name swapped
• All letters from current employer + collaborators (no independence)
• Letters that recite resume without explaining impact
Indian-cohort tip: secure 1-2 US-based letters from senior figures (US faculty / US C-suite) early — adjudicators weight US-jurisdiction expert opinion more than foreign-only sets.
§5 — DURATION + EXTENSION (40-60 words)
Initial O-1: up to 3 years (length of event/work). Extensions in 1-year increments indefinitely if continuing work in field. No dual-intent restriction (8 CFR §214.2(o)(13)), so O-1 holders can pursue EB-1A (extraordinary ability green card) concurrently — common Indian-cohort strategy given EB-2/EB-3 backlog.
§6 — O-3 DEPENDENTS (40-60 words)
Spouse + unmarried children under 21 receive O-3. O-3 spouse cannot work (unlike H-4 EAD). Plan accordingly — if dual-career, consider sponsoring spouse on independent O-1 or H-1B.
End with: "DRAFT O-1A STRATEGY — for U.S. immigration attorney review (AILA-member). O-1A is the strongest non-cap visa for high-achieving Indian beneficiaries; the petition is evidence-heavy and benefits from careful expert-letter sourcing 4-6 months before filing."Unlock the vault to see the full prompt