Statements of Purpose & cover letters
Study permits, skilled-worker applications, family sponsorship — the AI asks you about gap years, finances, intent, then writes the draft.
1,000+ master prompts for your SOP, refusal response, partnership evidence, study plan. + 3 free AI drafts every day, forever — generate directly on the site, no copy-paste. Same AI toolkit consultants use. Reviewed by you before filing.
A drafting tool, not legal advice. Have a licensed immigration consultant or lawyer review AI-generated drafts before submission.
The actual library · click any prompt · paste into ChatGPT or Claude · or generate on-site
Same library. Two ways to run it. Use whichever fits your workflow — even switch mid-file.
Search 1,208 master prompts. Filter by destination, service, scenario. First one free, no signup.
Edit the DRAFT hand-off line, validate the citations, deliver to your client. 25 min → 2 min per file.
I'm sitting in Hyderabad, Beijing or Mexico City with my DS-160 half-filled and 14 Chrome tabs open on USCIS, AILA, /r/F1visa, /r/USCIS and the State Department's visa-wait-time tracker. The US immigration attorney I emailed quoted $3,000 for the F-1 file (and that didn't include the H-1B prep when I convert later). The State Department says self-representation is fine. I just don't know how to write a Statement of Purpose that survives a 60-second F-1 visa interview at the consulate.
This library gives me the US-specific Statements of Purpose, I-20 financial-evidence covers, DS-160 supporting narratives, H-1B cap-petition letters and B-1/B-2 visitor cover letters a US immigration attorney would draft. Every prompt is anchored to actual INA sections, USCIS Policy Manual chapters and FAM 9 visa-officer guidance.
F-1 visa application fee: $185. SEVIS fee: $350. Tuition deposit at a US grad school: $5,000. Flight: $1,200. Attorney retainer for F-1 file: $3,000 (and they want another $5,000 for the H-1B prep next year). I'd rather have $3,000 toward my security deposit in Boston or Austin than into an attorney for a file I can write myself.
Section 214(b) of the INA presumes I'm an intending immigrant unless I overcome that presumption — and consular officers refuse F-1 and B-1 applications under 214(b) every day, with no appeal mechanism. If I get refused, my SEVIS record is paused, my I-20 might get rescinded, and a 214(b) on my record makes the next interview harder. The attorney retainer is small money against a 214(b) hit — but only if it actually buys me a better answer.
F-1 interviews at US consulates last 60-90 seconds on average. The officer is looking for nonimmigrant intent under 214(b) and program credibility. The DS-160 question 'who is funding your study' has to align with my I-20 financial certification. My SOP has to articulate program rationale and a clear return-home plan. The library prompts walk me through the answers I'll actually say at the window — not paragraph-long essays the officer will never read.
I asked ChatGPT for my SOP and it referenced 'INA Section 214(c)' for my F-1 nonimmigrant intent. The correct section is 214(b). It also told my friend his H-1B cap-petition needed a 'Form I-797' — that's the receipt, not the petition (the petition is I-129). If a consular officer's notes show I'm citing the wrong sections, my credibility under 214(b) is gone before the second question.
Students, H-1B / O-1 work-visa applicants, family-sponsorship filers, B-1/B-2 visitor applicants. You'd rather put $3,000 toward your security deposit in Boston or Houston than into an attorney for a file you understand better than they do.
Filing your own DS-160 and F-1 file. You need an SOP that addresses 214(b) nonimmigrant intent, an I-20 financial-evidence cover that matches your bank statements, and a 60-second answer pack for the consular interview.
You have the employer sponsoring you. You need help with the cap-petition supporting narrative, the specialty-occupation rationale (for H-1B), the extraordinary-ability evidence pack (for O-1), the intracompany-transferee history (for L-1).
Filing I-130 for a relative or I-140 for employment-based PR. You need the relationship narrative, the bona-fide marriage evidence (Form I-130A), the employer support letter, the priority-date timing narrative.
Your F-1 or B-1/B-2 came back refused under 214(b). You're re-applying or moving to a different visa class. You need a structured re-application that addresses the specific concerns the consular officer raised — not the 'just apply again' Reddit advice.
Most visa files come down to four documents. Each prompt walks you through the questions, then drafts the page calibrated to United States visa office expectations.
Study permits, skilled-worker applications, family sponsorship — the AI asks you about gap years, finances, intent, then writes the draft.
Address every refusal reason point-by-point. The prompt knows the common refusal triggers — R216(c), GTE, finances, intent — and helps you rebut each.
A complete checklist for your visa type. Bilingual where you need it. Each line cites the source so you can verify.
Not a long form to fill. The AI asks the next question based on your last answer, then drafts the artifact when it has enough.
Seven things I'd otherwise be cobbling together at midnight — or paying a US immigration attorney $3,000 for. On-site AI drafts, the full US-specific prompt library, my variable vault, free updates when USCIS or the State Department changes a Policy Manual chapter. Bundled, paid once.
Hit 'Generate' on any prompt and the scripted intake + draft renders right here on the site — I never need ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro for the standard SOP / cover-letter work. Three full runs per calendar day, lifetime, on Google Gemini Flash.
F-1 Statements of Purpose, I-20 financial covers, DS-160 supporting narratives, H-1B cap-petition supporting letters, O-1 extraordinary-ability evidence packs, I-130 family-sponsorship files, B-1/B-2 visitor letters, 214(b) refusal-recovery responses. Anchored to actual INA sections and USCIS Policy Manual chapters.
Name, DOB, passport number, SEVIS ID, I-20 details, employer EIN (if applicable), academic history, financial-evidence totals — saved once, auto-fills into every prompt. Stop typing my own SEVIS ID 25 times.
Star the SOP version that finally addresses 214(b) cleanly. Add notes on what the mock-interview tightened. Re-open last Sunday's H-1B draft from /saved with one click.
Once I'm in Boston or San Jose: a LinkedIn rewrite for the US market, a community Reels script, an introduction note to my new manager, a thank-you to my US referees. Same library, post-arrival.
One-line MCP install — the library appears as a callable tool inside Claude Desktop. I can say 'find me the H-1B specialty occupation rationale' and it pulls the right prompt. Goodbye 27 Chrome tabs.
When USCIS updates the H-1B cap-selection rules, when the State Department changes the DS-160 question set, when a Policy Manual chapter gets reissued — affected prompts refresh within 7 days. The 12 months of regulatory updates is included in the $15.
No subscription. No monthly fee. No 'per petition' charge. Pay $15 once on Stripe, use it forever with weekly updates for 12 months. 7-day refund if it doesn't save me one weekend of rewriting my own SOP from scratch.
Each prompt runs a scripted intake in your AI of choice and ships a calibrated draft. Open one below to see the structure — sign up to unlock the full body and run it.
Picks F-1 vs J-1 academic route, builds the DS-160 application narrative, flags DS-2019 212(e) two-year home residency trap.
Mock interview script + 214(b) intent rebuttal for Indian student cohort. Covers Mumbai/Delhi/Hyderabad/Chennai consulate quirks.
Maps CPT (8 CFR 214.2(f)(10)) and OPT including STEM extension (8 CFR 214.2(f)(11)) — common Indian-cohort missteps.
The catalog ships as an MCP server. Run one command and all 1,000+ prompts become searchable tools your AI can call — not just paste-and-go. Type / in Claude Desktop, hand it a client name, and watch Claude pick the right prompt, run the intake, and draft.
Canada, Australia, UK in full depth. Seven more covered for the long-tail services. Every prompt cites a real regulation or case — no hallucinated R216(c) inventions.
Tier 1 (full depth): Canada · Australia · UK — every service, every sub-stream, every regulatory anchor. Tier 2: US · DE · AE · NZ · IE · SG · Schengen — top services covered.
+ 7 more service categories
IRPA · IRPR · Migration Act · UK Appendix · SCC
ITR · EPFO · GIC · PCC · PAN · NOC
1,000+ prompts. 12 countries. $15 once. Lifetime access.
Pay once. Get the full library. Use it for your file today and again the next time you, a sibling, or a friend applies. 7-day refund if it doesn’t earn its keep.
Stripe-secured · billed in USD
Licensed practitioners in United States are using these prompts in their own files — the same tool that helps them is what you'll be using on yours. Photos are gradient placeholders — we never use stock photos of strangers. Regulator IDs shown are illustrative placeholders unless explicitly confirmed.
“H-1B and O-1 intake prompts catch the evidentiary criteria I usually surface in the second meeting. I trimmed about thirty minutes off each new-matter onboarding.”
“EB-2 NIW prompt walks the client through the three Dhanasar prongs before they even open Word. My petitions read tighter and my first drafts are usable.”
“Family-based intake on I-130 is where the vault earns its keep for me. The questions on prior filings and overstay history catch the things that wreck cases later.”
Create your 🇺🇸 United States applicant account in 30 seconds. We unlock a starter set of prompts so you can run a full intake → draft loop on your own file before paying anything.
Upgrade later · $15 once · lifetime · 7-day refund
If you are filing your own US immigration application, please remember: AI drafts are starting points, not final answers. Read every line, verify all facts against current USCIS, DOS, and EOIR guidance, and strongly consider engaging a US immigration attorney (AILA-member preferred) or DOJ-accredited representative to review your final submission. Errors on US immigration filings can result in denial, RFEs, NOIDs, fraud / misrepresentation findings, and permanent inadmissibility under INA §212(a)(6)(C).