Statements of Purpose & cover letters
Study permits, skilled-worker applications, family sponsorship — the AI asks you about gap years, finances, intent, then writes the draft.
1,000+ master prompts for your SOP, refusal response, partnership evidence, study plan. + 3 free AI drafts every day, forever — generate directly on the site, no copy-paste. Same AI toolkit consultants use. Reviewed by you before filing.
A drafting tool, not legal advice. Have a licensed immigration consultant or lawyer review AI-generated drafts before submission.
The actual library · click any prompt · paste into ChatGPT or Claude · or generate on-site
Same library. Two ways to run it. Use whichever fits your workflow — even switch mid-file.
Search 1,208 master prompts. Filter by destination, service, scenario. First one free, no signup.
Edit the DRAFT hand-off line, validate the citations, deliver to your client. 25 min → 2 min per file.
I'm sitting in Bangalore, São Paulo or Lagos with 14 Chrome tabs open: Canada Express Entry, Australia Subclass 189, German Chancenkarte, NZ Green List, UK Skilled Worker, Portugal D7, UAE Golden Visa, Singapore EP. The migration consultant from a referral quoted me US$3,000 for a 'discovery and country recommendation' before any filing. They picked Canada because that's what they sell most. I want to actually decide based on my profile.
This library starts with a country-routing intake — it walks me through salary, qualifications, age, language scores, family situation, capital available, risk tolerance — and recommends the right destination + visa class before I draft a single SOP. Then it gives me the country-specific drafting templates a destination-specific consultant would use. One paid intake, every destination covered.
The Punjab consultant pushes Canada. The Goa one pushes Australia. The Bangalore one pushes Singapore. Each has a referral kickback from the destination college / agent. None of them ran an honest 'which country actually fits your profile' analysis. The library's country-routing intake is destination-neutral by design.
I've made spreadsheets comparing CRS scores vs Subclass 189 points vs Chancenkarte points. Each system uses different criteria — they're not directly comparable. The library's country-routing prompt translates my profile into all four systems at once and tells me where I'm actually competitive, not just 'eligible'.
Picking Canada when Germany would have fit my skills better costs me 5+ years on the wrong PR clock, the wrong tax regime, the wrong professional-recognition path. The destination decision matters more than the visa-file polish — and no destination-specific consultant has any incentive to tell me their country isn't right for me.
I asked ChatGPT 'best country for a 32yo software engineer with 7 years experience and a spouse'. It recommended 'Australia Subclass 189 with partner-skill bonus' — except partner-skill bonus requires my spouse to be in a Skilled Occupation List role, which she isn't (she's a teacher, not on the list). It gave me a path that didn't actually exist for my situation. The library's country-routing intake checks every prerequisite before recommending.
Skilled professionals weighing Canada vs Australia vs Germany vs Singapore. Students comparing UK vs NZ vs Ireland. Families looking at the right country for a 5-year settlement plus eventual PR. You'd rather pay $15 once for an honest country-routing tool than $3,000 to a consultant who has already picked the destination for you.
Tech, healthcare, engineering, finance professionals comparing skilled-migration routes across CA / AU / NZ / DE / UK / IE / SG. You need an honest country-routing intake that translates your profile into each country's points system and surfaces where you're actually competitive, not just eligible.
Comparing UK vs Canada vs Australia vs Ireland vs Germany vs NZ for your master's or undergrad. You need a side-by-side of tuition, post-study work rights, PR-pathway timelines, English-test requirements, financial-evidence thresholds — based on your actual academic and budget profile.
Choosing where to raise kids, what school systems work, which countries permit family-reunion most reliably, what the PR / citizenship clock looks like. You need a multi-destination family-impact analysis, not a single-country consultant pitch.
Comparing Portugal D2 vs UAE Golden Visa vs Singapore Tech.Pass vs Canada Startup Visa. You need an honest comparison of capital requirements, tax regimes, residency-vs-citizenship distinction, exit-strategy implications.
Most visa files come down to four documents. Each prompt walks you through the questions, then drafts the page calibrated to Global visa office expectations.
Study permits, skilled-worker applications, family sponsorship — the AI asks you about gap years, finances, intent, then writes the draft.
Address every refusal reason point-by-point. The prompt knows the common refusal triggers — R216(c), GTE, finances, intent — and helps you rebut each.
A complete checklist for your visa type. Bilingual where you need it. Each line cites the source so you can verify.
Not a long form to fill. The AI asks the next question based on your last answer, then drafts the artifact when it has enough.
Seven things I'd otherwise be cobbling together across 14 browser tabs — or paying a destination-biased migration consultant $3,000 for. On-site AI drafts, the country-routing intake plus full per-country prompt libraries, my variable vault, free updates when any destination country changes its rules. Bundled, paid once.
Hit 'Generate' on any country-routing or destination prompt and the scripted intake + recommendation + draft renders right here on the site — I never need ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro. Three full runs per calendar day, lifetime, on Google Gemini Flash.
Country-routing intake (which country fits my profile), CA / AU / UK / US / DE / IE / NZ / SG / AE / EU country libraries, comparison-grid generators, multi-country backup-plan covers. Anchored to each country's current regulation — no destination favouritism.
Name, DOB, qualifications, IELTS bands, work-history, salary, capital available — saved once, evaluated against every destination country's eligibility framework in parallel.
Star the country-routing recommendation I want to commit to. Add notes on the trade-offs. Re-open last Sunday's NZ-vs-AU comparison draft from /saved with one click.
Whichever country I land in: a LinkedIn rewrite for that market, a community Reels script, an introduction to my new manager, a thank-you to my referees. Same library, post-arrival, country-aware.
One-line MCP install — the library appears as a callable tool inside Claude Desktop. I can say 'compare my profile across CA / AU / DE' and the country-routing intake runs across all three. Goodbye 14 Chrome tabs.
When IRCC changes CRS, when Home Affairs adjusts Subclass 189, when DETE refreshes the Eligible Occupations List, when MOM tweaks COMPASS — affected prompts refresh within 7 days across every country. The 12 months of regulatory updates is included in the $15.
No subscription. No monthly fee. No 'per country' upgrade charge. Pay $15 once on Stripe, use it forever with weekly updates for 12 months across every destination country. 7-day refund if the country-routing intake doesn't surface at least one destination I hadn't seriously considered.
Each prompt runs a scripted intake in your AI of choice and ships a calibrated draft. Open one below to see the structure — sign up to unlock the full body and run it.
Match a prospect to 5-7 Canadian DLIs across budget, program, GPA, and PGWP eligibility.
End-to-end student visa strategy for Indian applicants. CRICOS-registered provider selection, GTE preparation, financial capacity planning.
Maps the Appendix Student requirements (CAS, financial, English, ATAS, age, genuine student) against the Indian applicant profile and produces a 7-week pre-application plan.
The catalog ships as an MCP server. Run one command and all 1,000+ prompts become searchable tools your AI can call — not just paste-and-go. Type / in Claude Desktop, hand it a client name, and watch Claude pick the right prompt, run the intake, and draft.
Canada, Australia, UK in full depth. Seven more covered for the long-tail services. Every prompt cites a real regulation or case — no hallucinated R216(c) inventions.
Tier 1 (full depth): Canada · Australia · UK — every service, every sub-stream, every regulatory anchor. Tier 2: US · DE · AE · NZ · IE · SG · Schengen — top services covered.
+ 7 more service categories
IRPA · IRPR · Migration Act · UK Appendix · SCC
ITR · EPFO · GIC · PCC · PAN · NOC
1,000+ prompts. 12 countries. $15 once. Lifetime access.
Pay once. Get the full library. Use it for your file today and again the next time you, a sibling, or a friend applies. 7-day refund if it doesn’t earn its keep.
Stripe-secured · billed in USD
Licensed practitioners in Global are using these prompts in their own files — the same tool that helps them is what you'll be using on yours. Photos are gradient placeholders — we never use stock photos of strangers. Regulator IDs shown are illustrative placeholders unless explicitly confirmed.
“I advise clients on multiple destinations. Having one library that covers Canada, UK, and Australia intake in the same format means I switch context cleanly.”
“The vault is the only resource I've seen that treats refusal recovery as its own discipline. My rebuttal letters are noticeably tighter.”
“Smart Mode routes the client to the right prompt without me having to remember which intake I need. Genuine time saved on every new file.”
Create your 🌍 Global applicant account in 30 seconds. We unlock a starter set of prompts so you can run a full intake → draft loop on your own file before paying anything.
Upgrade later · $15 once · lifetime · 7-day refund
If you are submitting your own visa or immigration application, please remember: AI drafts are starting points, not final answers. Read every line, verify all facts against the destination country's official government guidance, and have a licensed immigration practitioner in the destination country review your final submission before you file. Errors on immigration filings can result in refusal, fraud or misrepresentation findings, and multi-year or lifetime re-entry bans depending on the jurisdiction.